Nominated for Best New Political Blog of 2009

Weblogawards.Org

Showing posts with label Islamic terror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic terror. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Obama Bin Laden?

Isn’t ironic that the Congress is focused on passing a healthcare bill which violates the Constitutional restraints on government authority, while at the same time, Congress has abdicated an area of responsibility that the Constitution clearly lists as a primary function of the Federal Government. To provide for the security and defense of the United States is one of the enumerated powers that is granted to the Federal Government and while our DC demagogues chase legislation to bring about a socialist utopia, the threat of Islamic terror has grown exponentially in the face of the perceived feebleness of the Obama administration.

On December 24th, Nigerian born Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was aboard Northwest Airlines flight 253 as the aircraft prepared to land in Detroit Michigan. Abdulmutallab returned to his seat from a lengthy visit to the rest room where he covered himself with a blanket to hide his attempt to detonate the plastic explosive, PETN, hidden in pockets sewn into his underwear. Passengers reported hearing “popping” noises and began to smell what they described as a foul odor. Once passengers and members of the flight crew saw the leg of Abdulmutallab’s trousers and the wall adjacent to his seat were on fire, they pounced on the would-be suicide bomber and restrained him until the aircraft landed safely in Detroit.

Janet Napolitano, Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security, assured the nation that this was an isolated incident and did not appear to have any connection to organized terror. Well Abdulmutallab had another view. In police interviews, Abdulmutallab admitted that he was in Yemen from August until early December where he received training and material support from Al Qaida in order to carry out this attack. The Al Qaida faction in Yemen has since issued a statement claiming responsibility for the attempt. In an even more bizarre statement released to the press, Napolitano praised the capture of Abdulmutallab and claimed the system “worked”.

Really Janet? What system would that be? The system that allowed a man that was on at least one government “no-fly” list to board a plane bound for the United States? The system that ignored reports from Abdulmutallab’s father to the American Embassy that his son (Abdulmutallab) had become far more radical in recent months and posed a material threat to American interests? Or maybe it is the system that forces passengers aboard commercial aircraft to provide the first line of defense for America while Federal authorities are comfortably asleep at the wheel?

Apparently the only system that worked was Napolitano’s own insistence that there are no acts of terrorism, there are only man-caused disasters. The interests of the United States have been lost under this administration and that places our nation in danger. Homeland Security is more interested in the actions and whereabouts of United States citizens that are upset by this administration’s agenda, especially if those citizens are former military. The ATF is more interested in shooting down State ballot initiatives that preserve the second amendment rights of its citizens than they are about hunting down gangs and terror groups that have been obtaining fully automatic weapons that have been banned for decades. The Justice Department has ignored the military intent of terror groups and is preparing to turn the captured militants over to the civilian courts for trial. A move that again, places our nation in jeopardy as their Al Qaida brothers plot to disrupt the proceedings.

Abdulmutallab has already declared that he is not alone; that there is an army of other Al Qaida soldiers preparing their own attacks on America interests and embassies abroad and upon the American homeland itself. The purported leader of Yemen’s Al Qaida group is Sa'id Ali Jabir Al Khathim Al Shihri. Al Shihri was a Guantanamo detainee that was released and repatriated to Saudi Arabia in 2007. There was a board hearing that determined the status of Al Shihri’s detention in Guantanamo Bay. By unanimous vote, the board ruled that Al Shihri would be repatriated even though the review listed eleven primary factors favoring continued detention and only five that favored release or transfer. The board issued a report and corresponding memos on Al Shihri’s transfer but the documents were so heavily redacted that very little usable information remained that would point to a reason for their decision.

Whatever prompted the decision, the transfer placed Al Shahri in the hands of Saudi officials where he was enrolled in a rehabilitation program for former terrorists. Yep, they have reform schools for terrorists now which apparently have the same record of success that American rehabilitation programs have. Immediately upon his release from the Saudi rehabilitation program in January 2009, Al Shahri appeared in several jihadist videos, including one where he was identified as second in command of Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. He also appeared in a “You-Tube” video with three other men, identified as Abu Hareth Muhammad al-Oufi, Abu Baseer al-Wahayshi and Abu Hureira Qasm al-Rimi threatening America and American allies.

The New York Times reported that an earlier car bomb detonated outside the American Embassy in Sana was the work of the reformed and freed, Al Shihri. Now that the Yemen Al Qaida group has claimed responsibility for the attack attempted by Abdulmutallab, it is clear that Al Shihri is behind that as well.

How fortunate we are. If it were not for Janet Napolitano’s soothing assurances we might be fooled into believing that America is under as great a threat by Islamic extremists than we were prior to September 11, 2001. Even the idea that these are no longer acts of terrorism but mere man-caused disasters makes it so much better now. Yes the system indeed worked and one must wonder if it will work even better in the future as we close Guantanamo and repatriate even more of these unfortunate and misunderstood detainees.

As the new “system” under Obama’s administration continues its efforts to soft-pedal the threat of Islamic terror, it is simply charming that Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security and Eric Holder’s Justice Department are more concerned with a possible American backlash against Muslims and now Nigerians, in response to new threats of terrorism. Sorry Janet…I meant man-caused disasters. Actually, the way things have been going these days, I’m surprised the passengers that tackled and restrained Abdulmutallab were not themselves arrested for assault or even possibly, for perpetrating a hate crime against this poor man. After all, anything could have caused his pants to burst into flames so it must have been prejudice that prompted them to tackle Abdulmutallab instead of rendering assistance to him.

Hmm? Could it be that it is the attack on Abdulmutallab by fellow passengers itself that Napolitano is concerned with? Could this be part of the backlash she warned us about? It is clear to me that America under Barack Obama has become a far weaker presence in the world and it is the appearance of that frailty that has invited the renewed interest of Al Qaida. While Obama makes his world apology tour, bowing to foreign leaders and begging forgiveness for the Bush years, our security machine has been stripped of its most potent components and our enemies know it.

It would be wonderful if the world was that simple. The idea that showing fairness and kindness to Islamic terrorists would somehow change the paradigm and create an era of peace is indicative of the naivety of this President and of the left in general. The fact is that the fundamentalist roots of mid-east terror have existed for centuries and the terrorists hate for hate’s sake, not because of a detention camp in Cuba. Al Qaida does not seek dialogue with the West; they are only interested in the total destruction of America and the murder of all “infidels”. This is the first time in history that we are facing an enemy that wants nothing from us but our deaths and will stop at nothing, including the sacrifice of their own lives to accomplish that.

During the Revolutionary War, American colonists used Indian tactics and fought a guerilla war against Britain. The British Army, until then, had only fought in conventional wars against organized armies. The rigid discipline of the British Army could not adapt to this new kind of warfare and that is the real reason that the Colonies prevailed. Without the willingness of the Obama administration to admit that this is a non-traditional war and that we will have to consider brutal and unconventional means to combat the threat, we will lose just as surely as the British did.

Abdulmutallab’s attempt was close to having been a reality and if successful, would have rained flaming wreckage down upon the city of Detroit as well as killing everyone aboard that plane. We must engage these factions as relentlessly as they seek to engage us and we must fight them wherever they appear with a ferocity that will leave no doubt as to our resolve. When it comes to the defense of the United States, nothing should be "off the table".

Paul

Thursday, November 12, 2009

The Tragedy at Fort Hood

The official count at Fort Hood Texas is thirteen dead and thirty wounded but is that really all? There are people that will never recover from this. Families pray daily for the safe return of their loved ones from Iraq and Afghanistan, never considering that there was a monster in their midst right here; never imagining that something like this could ever happen on a United States Military base.

The killing and wounding of our brave soldiers is a tragedy only made worse by the flow of insults that followed the shootings. Main stream press has gone out of their way to paint a picture of a disturbed man that snapped once he learned he was being deployed. The press further sickened us by insinuating that Americans may take matters into their own hands and exact bigoted and hateful retribution against innocent Muslims. Not one of them would dare call this what it is…an act of terror perpetrated not by some poor troubled man, but by an Islamic extremist. Not one of them would stop to think that Americans are mostly law abiding citizens and do not take revenge of innocent people for the actions of a few.

Insult number two came shortly after the shootings when it became crystal clear that this was 100% preventable. The FBI had already been aware of Hasan’s emails to a radical cleric in Yemen and investigations are beginning to show that they declined to investigate Hasan for fear of being accused of violating his first amendment rights. In fact, they didn’t even bother to notify military authorities that Maj. Hasan had attempted to contact this cleric with reported ties to Al Qaida. Just to put that in perspective, we arrested hundreds during the cold war for being suspected of contacting Soviet interests and agents. We even rounded up thousands of people of Japanese descent during World War II and relocated them to internment camps for fear they might “try” to contact Japanese agents.

It is a mere eight years after Islamic extremists attacked the United States, killing thousands, and we are still uncovering plot after plot to inflict further damage to America. We are engaged in two wars to weed out those that are responsible but we have to be cautious about offending someone serving in our military that is known to have made statements in defense of Islamic militants taking up arms against American soldiers? Army Chief of Staff General George Casey, when questioned why a Muslim with Hasan’s behavior was retained in the military, went as far as to say that the loss of diversity in the Army would be a greater tragedy than what had occurred at Fort Hood. I have no words to display my anger at something so mindless. This man’s statement was as hurtful to the injured and the families of the dead as anything Nidal Hasan has done to them. Insult number three.

For insult number four, the President approached the microphone on the day of the shooting to give a press briefing on the tragedy. Before he actually got around to speaking to the nation about this horrific terror attack he made sure he said hello to all of his friends in the audience. He then spoke about the conference his staff had with the Native American community and the “extraordinary” work his staff did to make that conference a success. “This is a top priority for us” he added. Only after he stated that he has further remarks about the progress made during the conference that he will add later but “as some of you may have heard, there has been a terrible shooting at Fort Hood Texas”.

As some of you may have heard? The nation was glued to their TV’s and radios in shock over this attack, everything on the screen said that this was a press briefing by the President on the shootings and he begins with waving hello to his friends and telling his staff what a great job they are doing? General McChrystal, Obama’s hand picked theater commander, requested additional troops or warned that they would lose the war in Afghanistan. That request was made in the middle of September and despite Obama’s campaign promise that he would listen to his Generals and give them the support and materials they need to accomplish their mission, President Obama is still “mulling it over”. Is this just inexperience or does he actually have disdain for the military? The idea that he would shout out to his friends and mention his “top priority” of Indian affairs before addressing the nation about the thirteen soldiers that were brutally murdered and the thirty that had suffered injuries, some of them life threatening, only gives that question deeper meaning.

This President seems to have his own idea of priorities and remains dangerously focused on them, even when events demand flexibility. He does not appear to possess the dynamic ability to shift his attention very easily when a crisis looms on the horizon. As President, if you are incapable of making a command decision at a moments notice, then you better have the people around you that can and be willing to let them do their jobs. Still, I don’t believe that is really the issue. I believe that the President remains focused on his agenda because it is his agenda. The push for healthcare is a driving issue for him and like any elitist, he believes he knows what we need better than we do. As this is his focus, the healthcare bill remains his highest priority to the exclusion of the economy and the soldiers that remain in jeopardy waiting for the Commander in Chief to make a decision.

Curiously, Obama took time from his push on healthcare to lobby on the behalf of Chicago for the 2016 Olympics. After all, that was for his friends up there. Hmm….maybe that is what this is all about. Who are his friends? Well, ACORN and a host of their affiliates are for sure. ACORN et al, has a lot of property in the Chicago area, much of which is decrepit and neglected. Gee, an Olympic village would have been a great way to sell all of that property at market value even if it were on the verge of being declared condemned as unfit for habitation. Don’t forget that there are also many provisions in the healthcare bill to allow community organizations like ACORN to administer neighborhood wellness programs.

The unions are clearly friends of Obama and in large part were responsible for his election so he owes them too. The President found time in the middle of the banking crisis to issue (some would say sneak in) an executive order that would give union contractors preference in Federal projects of $25 million dollars or more. Also, what would strengthen union bargaining power if they didn’t have to have healthcare benefits weighing down the package that was in negotiations? As companies find that the fine for not having insurance is substantially less that actually providing for insurance, many will drop their benefits and let their employees shift to the public option. Of course, as long as there is a government plan, unions will agree to the loss of health benefits if there is a wage increase in trade.

Oh yes, and since union contractors now have preference for Federal projects, guess who will see the lion share of projects to revamp that power grid if cap and trade passes? General Electric’s Jeff Imelt, another friend and advisor to Obama, will benefit from cap and trade as well as GE supplies the smart meters and hardware for the grid updates. There is a manufactured home “cash for clunkers” program in the cap and trade bill which means even more work for those lucky union contractors and of course, community based organizations will be there too to help all of those poor people get out of their old inefficient homes and in to brand new ones courtesy of the taxpayer.

Oh this is an awfully good time to be a friend of Obama. It seems like none of them have been left out of the cash grab as we embark on the largest redistribution of wealth this nation has ever seen. Obama is not inexperienced but rather, his experience is just the latest manifestation of corrupt Chicago politics. He appears not to care for the military because he hasn’t found a way to make anything he would do for them another cash cow for his circle of friends and that is the biggest insult of them all.

Paul