Nominated for Best New Political Blog of 2009

Weblogawards.Org

Showing posts with label Progressive Caucus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Progressive Caucus. Show all posts

Friday, April 16, 2010

Target 2010 - Phil Hare (D-IL)

Phil Hare was elected to Congress as part of the 2006 Democratic sweep brought on by America’s general dissatisfaction with George Bush’s policies. The anti-war movement aided by liberals in the main stream media had certainly strived to make Bush toxic by linking him with the rising number of American soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan and the allegations of US mistreatment of terror suspects. While that certainly didn’t help Bush, his downfall, like his father, had more to do with fiscal policies and the perception that he was disconnected from the true concerns of the American people.

Phil Hare came from a blue-collar family which is a plus to anyone running for public office in Illinois. He worked at the Seaford Clothing Factory in Rock Island where he spent thirteen years. During the time he worked at the Seaford Clothing Factory, Phil served as a union leader and as President of the Unite Here Local 617, an offshoot of the AFL-CIO. He also served six years as an Army reservist.

Proving that Illinois really doesn’t ask much of their elected officials, Mr. Hare is a product of Alleman High School in Rock Island and had earned an Associates Degree from Black Hawk College in Moline. An Associates Degree is an undergraduate academic degree awarded by community colleges, junior colleges and some four year colleges after completion of a course of study usually lasting two years. Since Hare doesn’t expand on the studies he completed to earn his degree, I can only assume it was Liberal Arts, P.E. or perhaps underwater basket weaving; the favored subject of limited achievers.

Hare began dabbling in politics when he ran as an Alternate Delegate to the Democratic Presidential Convention in support of Senator Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts in 1980. One of the three delegates for Kennedy, Hare and his fellow Kennedy supporters were defeated by the delegates running in support of Jimmy Carter. In 1982 Phil left his union position to help Lane Evans, who was running for the US Congress against Republican incumbent, Tom Railsback. Hare and Evans had been close friends since 1976 when they worked together as volunteers for Senator Fred R. Harris' campaign for President. Surprisingly, Tom Railsback was defeated in the Republican primary by conservative challenger, State Senator Kenneth McMillan forcing Evans and Hare to shift gears and turn their attention to McMillan. Evans would defeat McMillan in November, and in appreciation, appointed Hare as district director.

For the next twenty-four years, Hare worked as an aide to Evans and assisted him mostly in the areas of constituent issues and labor problems. As an aide to Evans, Phil Hare oversaw the closings of Case International Harvestor plant in East Moline and the Maytag plant in Galesburg. The closings of these major businesses and many others resulted in a loss of more than 2,200 jobs in the 17th district as US companies began to flee over-regulation and high taxes in the US for countries that were a little more appreciative of the role successful corporations play in the health of an economy.

After Evans announced his retirement in March of 2006, Hare announced his candidacy to succeed Evans. Hare received the endorsement of Lane Evans and in a special Democratic caucus of precinct committee members from the 17th Congressional District, Hare defeated the four other candidates and became the district’s Democratic candidate for the 2006 Congressional race where Hare focused much of his campaign on labor issues. Since Illinois is not a right to work State, many people of the 17th district are union members (whether they like it or not) and let’s face it, labor issues in a State that loves to drive business away with union interference is an important issue for the people left looking for work. Apparently his promises worked and Hare defeated Republican Andrea Zinga in the general election of 2006 and ran unopposed in 2008 counting on America’s dissatisfaction with Bush and an easy ride on Obama’s coat tails.

Hare has followed Evans’s lead and his voting record is not just Liberal, it is very Liberal. That shouldn’t surprise anyone; especially since the mask came off shortly after the election and people found that Hare was not merely a Democrat, a Liberal or a union man….he was a Progressive and would become one of the founding members of the of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Caucus, a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and an ardent supporter of the Progressive Caucus’s Socialist agenda.

Hare is an unapologetic supporter of Labor Unions and unfortunately, Labor Unions are for the most part, unapologetic supporters of Socialist ideology. Curiously, Hare doesn’t appear to be an unapologetic supporter of the actual union members and has openly supported Card Check, a provision in a recently proposed bill that would strip union members of the right to cast a secret ballot in union elections. The secret ballot was the membership’s only protection against intimidation and scare tactics used by corrupt and violent union leaders and while this maybe something a former union President would love to offer his “friends” as a gift, it is certainly something the rank and file is overwhelmingly opposed to.

Hare also voted for the recent healthcare bill even though he had previously stated that he would never support healthcare legislation that did not include, in his words, “a robust public option”. In a recent interview, Hare was asked about the Constitutionality of the healthcare legislation to which he replied: “I don't worry about the Constitution on this to be honest…I worry about the thousands of people that are dying because they don’t have health insurance." As video clips of his dismissive comments about our Constitution made their way across the internet and onto the news, Hare responded saying that his statement was taken out of context and what he really meant was that he was not concerned about the constitutional challenge to the legislation. I’m not so sure about his explanation because as the questioning continued, the interview started to ask what part of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to require people to purchase health insurance but Hare interrupted him and blurted out "I don't know! I don't know!... But at the end of the day I want to bring insurance to every person that lives in this country."

Hare mistakenly added that the Constitution guarantees everyone the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. An unidentified voice on the tape reminded Congressman Hare that the line he just quoted was from the Declaration of Independence and not the Constitution but that didn’t matter much either. He waved his hand and said “either one.” Either one? This may come as a shock to the Black Hawk doctor of underwater basket weaving but he swore an oath to support and defend one of those documents when he became a Congressman and most of us think it would be a really good idea if he knew which one it was and what it actually says.

Why would we expect Mr. Hare would have actually read the Constitution when he obviously hasn’t read the bill he had just voted for? When asked if he had read the bill he told the interviewer that he had read the bill three times. Really? To have read the 8100 pages of the bill and the corresponding documents that would have to be read for the bill to make sense in the time the House leadership allowed before the vote, one would have to read one page each minute and then comprehend what it means in totality. That, my friends, would be a feat for a bona fide speed reader let alone a union boss with a two year degree in arts and crafts (or whatever it was).

Clearly Mr. Hare has no respect for the Constitution; no respect for union members and even less respect for his constituents if he can vote for a bill that he could not possibly have read. In fact, to vote for a bill that he openly opposed on principal simply because Nancy Pelosi told him to, Phil Hare must have very little respect for his own convictions and that is something that worries me most of all.

Paul

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

The Liberal score of Congressional Progressives

In order to reinforce my case about the intentions and ideology of the progressives in Congress I am going to rely on those sources that endorse these people.

Groups that traditionally seek radical solutions in American politics give progressives very high marks and those marks establish a history of their support for extremely liberal legislation, each of which move this nation inexorably into the abyss of socialism. By conservative estimates, the national debt will reach a staggering 101% of the Gross Domestic Product, the entire earning capacity of our economy by 2011, a level that has not been seen since the years immediately following the massive spending required by World War II.

World War II was certainly an excellent reason to take the nation into debt. It took a full thirty years to lower that debt to a nearly acceptable 33% of GDP and that was before trade agreements and tax increases sent many of our manufacturing industries overseas. The current estimates show that the National Debt during the first four years of Mr. Obama’s Presidency will increase an additional $6.6 Trillion dollars; an amount that is equal to the increase in debt during both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations combined. So what is the reason for the outrageous spending now?

Even though we are looking at a financial meltdown, President Obama and his friends in Congress are still pushing forward to enact additional massive expansion of entitlement spending and the economy crippling taxes that are contained in the healthcare reform and cap and trade bills. This makes no sense unless the goal is to destroy the Federal Treasury and collapse the capitalistic economic system in the United States. There are those who believe this would force this nation into socialism and eventually, all nations into a single world government as the world financial system fails in a globalist’s expansion of the Cloward-Piven Strategy. Certainly, a willing socialist movement in Congress would be needed to perpetrate such a grand scheme. So how can we identify that willing faction?

From Wikipedia “The group [Americans for Democratic Action] was established by prominent Democratic Party leaders in 1947 with the stated goal of combating what those leaders perceived to be an acceptance of, or even an alliance with, American communists. ADA's leaders considered communism (especially as practiced in the Soviet Union) to be both morally wrong and a threat to the United States.”

The original founders of Americans for Democratic Action were Eleanor Roosevelt, Hubert Humphrey, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. and John Galbraith. The truth of the matter is that many “new dealers” were part of the foundation of this organization and their real goal was, and remains, to sneak a socialist agenda into the American political system under the radar. By claiming to fight against communism they had hoped to promote socialism in the United States under the banner of progressivism. Today members and associates of the Americans for Democratic Action say more about their mission than their mission statement does. Overt socialists such as Ed Asner, Bernie Sanders, Jeff Faux and Ann Lewis are installed as Honorary Vice Presidents as are many members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

The Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) issue “scores” for legislators based on the frequency with which they vote for progressive and liberal causes. With a score of 100 indicating the most liberal and left leaning, I am proud to say that I visited their website and after taking their on-line test to determine how liberal I really am, I scored a perfect zero! I wish I could say the same for members of Congress, particularly the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. So what scores have the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus earned from the ADA?
Let’s start with the founder of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont

Bernard "Bernie" Sanders ADA Score – 100%

Bernie Sanders is a self-described democratic socialist, but because he does not belong to a formal political party, he appears as an independent on the ballot. He is the first person elected to the U.S. Senate to identify as a socialist. Sanders caucuses with the Democratic Party and is counted as a Democrat for the purposes of committee assignments. He was also the only independent member of the House during much of his service there. He is one of two independent Senators in the 111th Congress, along with Joe Lieberman. Sanders left the House in order to run in the 2006 election for the Senate seat being vacated by retiring fellow independent Jim Jeffords and won the election with 65% of the vote.

So how do the rest of them stack up? Let’s see the scores state by state….
Arizona: Ed Pastor – 100%, Raúl Grijalva – 100%,
California: Lynn Woolsey – 80%, George Miller – 95%, Barbara Lee – 100%, Pete Stark – 90%, Michael Honda – 95%, Sam Farr – 100%, Henry Waxman – 95%, Xavier Becerra – 100%, Judy Chu – not rated yet - assumed office July 2009), Diane Watson – 100%, Lucille Roybal-Allard – 95%, Maxine Waters – 95%, Laura Richardson – 100%, Linda Sanchez – 100%, Bob Filner – 100%
Colorado: Jared Polis – not rated yet (assumed office January 2009)
Connecticut: Rosa DeLauro – 100%
Florida: Corrine Brown – 95%, Alan Grayson – not rated yet - assumed office January 2009), Robert Wexler – 90%, Alcee Hastings – 95%
Georgia: Hank Johnson – 100%, John Lewis – 95%
Hawaii: Neil Abercrombie – 95%, Mazie Hirono – 100%
Illinois: Bobby Rush – 30% (don’t get excited – according to the Freedom Index Mr. Rush just doesn’t vote very often), Jessie Jackson Jr. – 100%, Luis Gutierrez – 90%, Danny Davis – 80%, Jan Schakowsky – 100%, Phil Hare – 100%,
Indiana: André Carson – 75%
Iowa: Dave Loebsack – 90%
Maine: Chellie Pingree – (not rated yet - assumed office January 2009)
Maryland: Donna Edwards - (not rated yet - assumed office June 2008), Elijah Cummings – 100%
Massachusetts: John Oliver – 100%, Jim McGovern – 100%, Barney Frank – 100%, John Tierney – 95%, Ed Markey – 100%, Mike Capuano – 95%
Michigan: Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick – 95%, John Conyers – 100%
Minnesota: Keith Ellison – 100%
Mississippi: Bennie Thompson – 90%
Missouri: William Lacy Clay Jr. – 100%, Emanuel Cleaver – 90%
New Jersey: Donald Payne – 95%, Frank Pallone – 100%
New Mexico: Ben R. Luján - (not rated yet - assumed office January 2009)
New York: Jerry Nadler – 95%, Yvette Clark – 100%, Nydia Velazquez – 100%, Carolyn Maloney – 95%, Charles Rangel – 85%, Jose Serrano – 100%, John Hall – 95%, Maurice Hinchey – 95%, Louise Slaughter – 95%, Eric Massa - (not rated yet - assumed office January 2009)
North Carolina: Mel Watt – 100%
Ohio: Marcy Kaptur – 100%, Dennis Kucinich – 95%, Marcia Fudge - (not rated yet - assumed office November 2008)
Oregon: Earl Blumenauer – 95%, Peter DeFazio – 90%,
Pennsylvania: Bob Brady – 100%, Chaka Fattah – 95%
Tennessee: Steve Cohen – 100%
Texas: Sheila Jackson-Lee – 100%, Eddie Bernice Johnson – 100%
Vermont: Peter Welch – 90%
Virginia: Jim Moran – 95%
Washington: Jim McDermott – 95%
Wisconsin: Tammy Baldwin – 100%, Gwen Moore – 95%

There are two more members of the Caucus that we cannot score because they are non-voting members from the Virgin Islands and the District of Columbia. They are Donna Christensen and Eleanor Holmes Norton.

So far adding them all up, the average score is still 99% in favor of extremely liberal legislation. There are even more members of Congress that score equally as high but do not belong to the Congressional Progressive Caucus for one reason or another. Combined, these are the people that think that Obama hasn’t gone far enough. These are the people that would empty the treasury to fund redistributive programs and raise taxes to stifle an already stricken economy. These are the same people that salivate at the idea of massive new programs that will expand the Federal Government to twice its present size and still want more. These are the people that must be voted from office while there is still a United States of America under a lawful Constitution.

Tomorrow….Cloward and Pivens; evil personified.

Paul